🔗 Share this article

As a game master, I traditionally shied away from significant use of randomization during my tabletop roleplaying sessions. I tended was for narrative flow and what happened in a game to be determined by player choice rather than random chance. That said, I decided to alter my method, and I'm truly pleased with the outcome.

The Inspiration: Watching 'Luck Rolls'

A well-known streamed game features a DM who frequently asks for "fate rolls" from the players. This involves picking a type of die and assigning consequences contingent on the roll. While it's essentially no distinct from using a pre-generated chart, these get invented in the moment when a player's action has no clear conclusion.

I decided to try this approach at my own table, mostly because it seemed interesting and presented a break from my standard routine. The outcome were fantastic, prompting me to reflect on the often-debated dynamic between preparation and spontaneity in a tabletop session.

A Powerful In-Game Example

In a recent session, my party had just emerged from a large-scale fight. When the dust settled, a cleric character inquired after two friendly NPCs—a pair—had survived. Instead of picking a fate, I handed it over to chance. I told the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The possible results were: on a 1-4, both died; on a 5-9, a single one would die; on a 10+, they both lived.

The die came up a 4. This triggered a incredibly emotional moment where the adventurers found the remains of their companions, still united in their final moments. The party conducted funeral rites, which was uniquely significant due to prior story developments. As a final reward, I improvised that the forms were suddenly transformed, revealing a enchanted item. I randomized, the item's magical effect was perfectly what the group required to address another pressing story problem. It's impossible to orchestrate these kinds of serendipitous moments.

Honing On-the-Spot Skills

This event made me wonder if chance and thinking on your feet are in fact the core of this game. Even if you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles may atrophy. Adventurers frequently take delight in ignoring the most detailed plans. Therefore, a effective DM must be able to adapt swiftly and invent content in the moment.

Employing luck rolls is a great way to train these abilities without venturing too far outside your comfort zone. The key is to use them for small-scale circumstances that won't drastically alter the campaign's main plot. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to decide if the main villain is a secret enemy. But, I would consider using it to decide whether the PCs reach a location right after a key action occurs.

Enhancing Collaborative Storytelling

Spontaneous randomization also helps keep players engaged and create the feeling that the story is alive, evolving according to their choices in real-time. It reduces the sense that they are merely actors in a DM's sole story, thereby bolstering the cooperative aspect of the game.

Randomization has long been embedded in the original design. Early editions were filled with charts, which suited a playstyle focused on exploration. Even though current D&D tends to prioritizes plot-driven play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, this isn't always the required method.

Striking the Right Balance

There is absolutely no problem with doing your prep. Yet, equally valid no issue with letting go and allowing the rolls to decide some things instead of you. Authority is a major aspect of a DM's responsibilities. We use it to facilitate play, yet we can be reluctant to give some up, at times when doing so could be beneficial.

My final suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Embrace a little improvisation for smaller details. The result could find that the surprising result is significantly more powerful than anything you would have pre-written in advance.